Performance Chat Summary: 10 February 2026

The full chat log is available beginning here on Slack.

Table of Contents

WordPress Performance Trac tickets

@westonruter shared query, noting that there are currently 12 total tickets when including defects and enhancements, and 9 non-defect tickets specifically.
@westonruter pointed out that PR #10855, which improves the robustness of page cache detection logic in Site Health, could use another review.
@spacedmonkey shared that PR #10531 had just been approved and would be committed shortly.
- @westonruter asked about a review comment on that PR regarding password-protected posts.
- @spacedmonkey replied that the current implementation does not account for password-protected posts, but functionally behaves the same as before, while now benefiting from using WP_Query.
- @spacedmonkey added that switching to WP_Query opens up additional possibilities beyond caching, including filters and extensibility.
@westonruter also highlighted that the PR #9260 appears ready for commit and shared plans to commit it later that day.

@westonruter shared that there had been no responses yet on the Performance Lab CODEOWNERS audit issue #2374.
- @b1ink0 shared that they would like to be added as a CODEOWNER for the Modern Image Formats plugin, as well as for Site Health tests they had added or updated.
- @westonruter replied that this sounded good and asked @b1ink0 to update the CODEOWNERS file directly in the PR to add themselves as appropriate.
@westonruter mentioned interest in merging the PR #2352 to better observe Copilot’s impact in practice.
@westonruter pointed out that there are several open View Transitions plugin PRs that still need review.
- @b1ink0 shared that they plan to address recent feedback on PR #2336 by the end of the week.

@westonruter raised a question about whether the GitHub Slack integration for the Performance repository is proving helpful or if it is becoming too noisy, noting a personal impression that it may be more noise than signal.
- @b1ink0 shared that the integration feels noisy, particularly due to Dependabot pull requests.
- @westonruter experimented during the meeting with subscribing and unsubscribing from the GitHub integration and observed that Slack does not currently support filtering out Dependabot notifications.
- @westonruter suggested that creating a separate “firehose” channel could be an option if the team wants to preserve visibility without overwhelming the main channel, while also noting that they are already subscribed to all issues and pull requests directly in the repository.